nemorathwald: (me Matt)
Several years ago, The Road Less Traveled suggested to me the idea that everyone could benefit from therapy, regardless of whether a crisis situation has developed to force them to consider themselves "sick." From observing the human race, I agree with the author that mental health is always a matter of degree. I'm dubious of the claim that a totally 100% perfect mental state needing no improvement should be considered "normalcy" and there are a few "sick" people outside that category. So I decided to take up therapy the way one takes up pottery.

One can really blow a lot of money that way if one isn't careful. Certain principles should be applied no matter what service is being provided: one should not go into anything without a clear definition of what one will get from it, how it's supposed to deliver that, and how to tell if it doesn't. I got a therapist who never did one single solitary thing except listen like some kind of glorified answering machine. Without his help, I carefully defined my therapeutic goals. (Have you? I recommend that you do.) I was doing a perfectly good job of achieving them without assistance. I'm certainly still attempting to do so. But even if some form of expertise could have accelerated the process of self-understanding, I demand to know the means and the metric for judging success before I plunk down cash for more than one session. He had no plan, refused to give advice or assignments or analysis, and no explanation for how anything he might have done would have acheived what I wanted-- that is, had he done anything.

I won't tell you how long it lasted. I like to style myself a skeptic, but after this experience I determined not to be so hard on people who go to criminal frauds like faith healers and "new age energy" alternative medicine blah blah blah. That's not what this guy was. I went to him because he had a degree and was accredited in psychology. Who knows what he learned from all that education. That's what I went to get, so I wish he had told me. I'm embarrased how long it took to disengage myself without seeming to insult this nice man. I appreciate the fact that he constantly marveled at how well we got along despite his biblical perspective and my committment to non-theism. Yes, he was a pastoral counselor. I actually couldn't find any other kind! How times have changed. But he never lectured me out of any inerrant revelation. Presumably he's helpful to a lot of people and just had nothing to say to me personally, or he would have gone out of business. Or, if his parishioners define no criteria to tell them when to stop throwing good money after bad (because of faith, hint hint), he might just be making their lives worse. I have no way to know which it is.

I already have people who will listen to me explore my inner space and offer feedback. You are doing so, gentle reader. And you aren't charging me a thing.
nemorathwald: (Default)
I had a conversation with a neopagan about religion recently. Now that I consider how this conversation set off my memetic allergies, it comes as no surprise that they usually don't want to talk about it with somebody like me! "Why would I as a non-religious person want them to talk about it?" one might ask. Because there are so many of them in my social circles these days, that I've been trying to sound them out; figure out what makes them tick and what to expect from them. It was nice most of the time; I smiled, and nodded a lot, trying to perceive the basic motivations and needs behind the bare descriptions of doctrines and practices.

And then the memetic allergy was triggered. The suggestion was made that the practices of ancient Native American astrologers qualified as "a kind of science." Also at one point, somewhere, god created adam and eve, the wiccan informed me. And at another point, somewhere else, the evolution of species took place. With a dizzying rush, images of the science classes of America's schoolchildren passed before my eyes. In this vision, obscurantists were storming the gates. Their eyes girded about with the blindfold of faith, with which to ward off the fiery darts of disillusionment. Yea verily did they beseech their brethren to girt about their ears with the headphones of constant indoctrination. Then, in my vision, took they up the megaphone of passionate conviction, and the forced grin of fatuous peace and tepid joy, yea verily did they preserve their authentic heritage, amen.

In short, I had a flashback to my Creation Scientist days. I realized there is more than harmless personal enrichment going on. Differences in worldviews are emerging in which real harm to real people is potentially at stake. Don't get me wrong, this individual I was talking to was splendid and certainly no obscurantist as far as I know. And I'm not placing blame with any individual. But there are issues with larger movements of deliberate ignorance and anti-science cultures that do worry me.

It's been easy to write off a lot of traits of convention-goers as charming eccentricities, but I can't afford to forget where the line is drawn. I have a deep antagonism to faith, nature and heritages; I love reason, technology and the future. So I set out, about two years ago, to find somewhere to call a home; that these dearly-held core values would not merely be barely tolerated but perhaps even celebrated. At that time I was employed by a church; I was married to a Christian and we couldn't respect each other; I had only recently stopped attending my parents' church that was self-described fundamentalist. It goes without saying that friendship and love are impossible if you surround yourself only with people who are so disappointing, because closeness would only reveal that disappointment. I was completely alienated and felt like the whole world would hate and reject me if I revealed my authentic values to anyone. It was very depressing.

Although I escaped that life and built some good friendships, recently I've become concerned that the overall subculture that I've entered has some aspects just as nauseating as the tent revivals. The fellowship of reason, technology and the future-- which I've heard postmodernists refer to as "modernism"-- will not be welcome to everybody around me; not by a long shot. A little of the old feeling of being in a fortress has come back, in which I feel that even a friend might suddenly turn out to be on the other side of a culture war. I still have to remain watchful for criminal spiritualistic fraud, the overturning of science and medicine, and other evils of gullibility. It's no less common in the New Age than in the dogmatic monotheisms. Friendships, affections or loves might turn to contempt, held in check only by a polite silence, as it was in my old life, where anything important just can't be talked about for fear of starting a fight. I hope I haven't gone out of the frying pan and into the fire.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223 2425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags