![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
According to these tests, my Systematizing Quotient is 22 and my Empathy Quotient is 12. This site says that most women tend to average an SQ of 24 and most men tend to average an SQ of 30, and that most women tend to average an EQ of 47 and most men tend to average an EQ of 42. And someone with High-Functioning Autism or Asperger's Syndrome has EQ of about 20, which is eight points better than mine. I've been feeling downright autistic lately in my dealings with some people (except without the accompanying genius), but I know better than to believe that feeling. This is further demonstration that personality evaluation tests are like psychics: the only answers they give back are the ones you unconsciously feed them. They reveal only what you already know or happen to believe. Throughout the empathy test I kept wondering how anyone can know an answer to give to the questions. If you fail to read people's feelings, how would you know? What if the emotions people think they're reading are just an illusion that they are projecting?
Re: Interesting...
Date: 2005-01-11 05:51 pm (UTC)Re: Interesting...
Date: 2005-01-11 06:55 pm (UTC)Admittedly, I don't know you that well, so I don't have a large data set on your social interactions, but so far, I don't see you as a highly empathic person. This doesn't mean that you're not an interesting and good person to be around. What you lack in empathic socialization, you clearly make up for with enthusiasm. And this is a good thing. :-)
20 years ago, I would probably have scored in the low 20's on this test, so I guess I'm living proof that social skills can be learned (and I'm still refining them).