one of my primary partners in crime is also very keen on physical applicability as a proving ground for relevance. i am inclined to agree that concreteness is a valuable testing ground.
the part that's thrilling, though, is when the inexplicable becomes concrete.
which, technically, is always, since naming things doesn't actually explain them.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-01-27 09:49 pm (UTC)the part that's thrilling, though, is when the inexplicable becomes concrete.
which, technically, is always, since naming things doesn't actually explain them.