nemorathwald (
nemorathwald) wrote2009-08-29 05:54 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
SMOFcamp Post-Mortem
It's 6AM. The failure of the first attempt at SMOFcamp has occupied my mind of late. It could be said to have competed for attention with the larger event in which it was embedded. However, there was at least one discussion that did take place at SMOFcamp. It was a wide-ranging series of petty grievances, criticisms, and plans to avenge grudges. I tried to turn it toward constructive suggestions, to no avail. That conversation has caused me to question one of the premises of SMOFcamp: that fandom hurts from lack of grassroots participation in its own direction, and would benefit from more.
Fandom might be better off with the current cold war of passive-aggressive sniping on the internet between cliques who don't talk to each other, than it would be with fandom's own equivalent of a town-hall meeting shouting match. Accomodations for allergies. For children. For handicaps. For reparations of each other's long-dead ancestors. For keeping an art show that nobody wants to staff or attend any more. Grudges over geek social fallacies. The impotent mewling of social-anxiety-sufferers, that the strong personalities get their way on concoms, by increasing the stress level until the shrinking violets resign. Threats over sound systems that are too loud for fifteen minutes playing music you don't like in a room that you could have just left. Whining over not getting free food when you want it.
The ones who I see getting things done, are willing to form coalitions of convenience with fans who they can barely tolerate sometimes. It requires that you humble yourself before someone else and let them have their way in exchange for their blood, sweat and tears. Effectiveness requires you to shut your feelings-hole for a year at a time and suck it up. That is the level of cool-headed, pragmatic leadership we need, not these useless emotional whiners. I am no longer sure whether cool new projects and innovative solutions would be born in a welcoming, populist environment like Open Spaces. It does for other communities, and I have enjoyed Open Spaces tremendously, but there are no guarantees of success with it.
I wonder, if a hundred of the most outspoken fans all gathered at SMOFcamp and discussed the topic "the future of fandom", would we all leave with such a bad taste in our mouths that there are no more cons? For the first time, I wonder if stonewalling the community is all that's keeping the community together.
I still want to try it and see.
Fandom might be better off with the current cold war of passive-aggressive sniping on the internet between cliques who don't talk to each other, than it would be with fandom's own equivalent of a town-hall meeting shouting match. Accomodations for allergies. For children. For handicaps. For reparations of each other's long-dead ancestors. For keeping an art show that nobody wants to staff or attend any more. Grudges over geek social fallacies. The impotent mewling of social-anxiety-sufferers, that the strong personalities get their way on concoms, by increasing the stress level until the shrinking violets resign. Threats over sound systems that are too loud for fifteen minutes playing music you don't like in a room that you could have just left. Whining over not getting free food when you want it.
The ones who I see getting things done, are willing to form coalitions of convenience with fans who they can barely tolerate sometimes. It requires that you humble yourself before someone else and let them have their way in exchange for their blood, sweat and tears. Effectiveness requires you to shut your feelings-hole for a year at a time and suck it up. That is the level of cool-headed, pragmatic leadership we need, not these useless emotional whiners. I am no longer sure whether cool new projects and innovative solutions would be born in a welcoming, populist environment like Open Spaces. It does for other communities, and I have enjoyed Open Spaces tremendously, but there are no guarantees of success with it.
I wonder, if a hundred of the most outspoken fans all gathered at SMOFcamp and discussed the topic "the future of fandom", would we all leave with such a bad taste in our mouths that there are no more cons? For the first time, I wonder if stonewalling the community is all that's keeping the community together.
I still want to try it and see.
no subject
"should we organize cons without committees"
Without board meetings. Committees work well. Boards of Directors on the other hand, are a consistent source of frustrations that I hear in fandom-- with the exception of you and Jer, and I don't expect that to last forever.
I'm still curious what the one discussion that did happen was, but it sounds like it went very poorly.
It wasn't a scheduled topic. People just saw an empty table, sat down, and talked about several unrelated topics in the space of ten minutes. I'm not sure if you asked them, if any of them would have been aware they were participating in SMOFcamp.
no subject
Boards of Directors have to exist if the con, or the organization behind it, is incorporated. If you don't incorporate, then the individuals running the event have personal legal liability for debts it incurs, or lawsuits filed against it. If you ever decide to spin up an event that doesn't protect the organizers that way (or something similar, like going under another larger organization), no knowledgeable person will be willing to be an organizer of it unless they're so broke that they just don't care what happens to them. No way I'm putting my personal resources on the line. (Yes, I might put up some of my own money, but I want to limit the risk to what I decide I'm putting up, rather than having some random attendee hurt themselves and try to take my house away.)